"There is no character of the crowd" This is a sociological theory
This principle is recognized from the time of the rise of the Left
And since the French Revolution
Maybe it's true to some extent
This principle is also recognized
It has been established to provide legal cover and favors, possibly
But what kind of crowd must know this
The principal essential element of the crowd would be "attraction and invitation afterwards in action by rage or serenity"
when A crowd that is not gathered at the call of any one or two
Rather, the result of any immediate action or event is to collect the response group.
If there is an accident, then people gather to see the intervention or tamasha, if there is a fire, there is flood, water, so far people are assembled to see if helicopters or any popular person goes by the road.
This type of crowd has a charm element but there is no clear invitation by any person or organization.
Thus, the character of the above type of crowd is made in accordance with the immediate event, but the consensus of the mind is often different.
In other words the principle is that
When, for a particular purpose, a specially recognized people are invited to gather in the form of a mass gathering, in which two or more leadership work is set up, and in accordance with the work direction, people engaged in the crowd, their mindset, collectively Change in form and become furious as per the established leadership of the established leadership.
There is also a candle-march of peace in such a crowd that people gathered to watch the movie or crowd of people assembled to hear the speech of a popular leader or a mob assassin riot.
The character of such a crowd is spelled, the state of mind is collectively one.
But as such it has been established that there is no character of the crowd? Under the same rule, there will be established and make its also a sociological theory that terrorism extremism have no religion.
This principle is recognized from the time of the rise of the Left
And since the French Revolution
Maybe it's true to some extent
This principle is also recognized
It has been established to provide legal cover and favors, possibly
But what kind of crowd must know this
The principal essential element of the crowd would be "attraction and invitation afterwards in action by rage or serenity"
when A crowd that is not gathered at the call of any one or two
Rather, the result of any immediate action or event is to collect the response group.
If there is an accident, then people gather to see the intervention or tamasha, if there is a fire, there is flood, water, so far people are assembled to see if helicopters or any popular person goes by the road.
This type of crowd has a charm element but there is no clear invitation by any person or organization.
Thus, the character of the above type of crowd is made in accordance with the immediate event, but the consensus of the mind is often different.
In other words the principle is that
When, for a particular purpose, a specially recognized people are invited to gather in the form of a mass gathering, in which two or more leadership work is set up, and in accordance with the work direction, people engaged in the crowd, their mindset, collectively Change in form and become furious as per the established leadership of the established leadership.
There is also a candle-march of peace in such a crowd that people gathered to watch the movie or crowd of people assembled to hear the speech of a popular leader or a mob assassin riot.
The character of such a crowd is spelled, the state of mind is collectively one.
But as such it has been established that there is no character of the crowd? Under the same rule, there will be established and make its also a sociological theory that terrorism extremism have no religion.
